[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13915493#comment-13915493
]
Amandeep Khurana commented on HADOOP-10372:
-------------------------------------------
bq. I'm not sure about deprecation as S3 does some things that s3n doesn't.
Interesting point, [[email protected]]. I'd be curious to understand more.
What are the things that S3 does that are useful to users and that can't be
done with S3N? If you think there is functionality in S3 because of which it
should be kept around, would it make sense to consider implementing that in S3N
and having a single option (if that implementation is possible)?
> Deprecate S3 implementation.
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10372
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10372
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fs/s3
> Reporter: Amandeep Khurana
> Priority: Minor
>
> We encourage users to use the S3N implementation. We should consider
> deprecating the older S3 implementation to avoid confusion down the road.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
