[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18042042#comment-18042042
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-17611:
-----------------------------------------
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #2897:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2897#issuecomment-3599561746
We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no
activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a
way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working
on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the
stale tag and review again.
Thanks all for your contribution.
> Distcp parallel file copy breaks the modification time
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-17611
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17611
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Adam Maroti
> Assignee: Adam Maroti
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 2h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The commit HADOOP-11794. Enable distcp to copy blocks in parallel.
> (bf3fb585aaf2b179836e139c041fc87920a3c886) broke the modification time of
> large files.
>
> In CopyCommitter.java inside concatFileChunks Filesystem.concat is called
> which changes the modification time therefore the modification times of files
> copeid by distcp will not match the source files. However this only occurs
> for large enough files, which are copied by splitting them up by distcp.
> In concatFileChunks before calling concat extract the modification time and
> apply that to the concatenated result-file after the concat. (probably best
> -after- before the rename()).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
