[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18017455#comment-18017455
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-19574:
-----------------------------------------

stoty commented on PR #7892:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7892#issuecomment-3242441698

   > @stoty , thanks for the update!
   > 
   > > The current HadoopThread (now renamed to SubjectInheritingThread) 
intentionally follows the Thread syntax as close as possible for minimum 
changes in the callers.
   > 
   > In this patch, we are changing
   > 
   > * `new Thread(..)` -> `new SubjectInheritingThread(..)`
   > 
   > My suggestion is to change
   > 
   > * `new Thread(..)` -> `new SubjectInheritingThread.newBuilder()...build()`
   > 
   > If we do it in separated JIRAs, we will need to rewrite the almost all 
code this PR.
   
   Unfortunately, that would only handle less than half of the thread creations.
   
   You cannot override the run() / work() method if you use a factory.
   We'd have to convert the run()/work() overrides to Runnables as well, and 
that cannot be handled by a simple search and replace.
   
   This patch is huge enough as is.




> Restore Subject propagation semantics for Java 22+
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-19574
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19574
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Istvan Toth
>            Assignee: Istvan Toth
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Java 22 breaks Subject propagation for new Threads (when SecurityManager is 
> not enabled).
> Previously, the Subject set by Subject.doAs() / Subject.callAs() 
> automatically propagated to any new Threads created (via new Thread(), not 
> Executors).
> With JDK22, this is no longer the case, new Threads do NOT inherit the 
> Subject.
> As Hadoop heavily relies on the original behavior, we somehow need to solve 
> this problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to