[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17924985#comment-17924985
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-19400:
-----------------------------------------

cnauroth opened a new pull request, #7367:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7367

   ### Description of PR
   
   Enhance the FS specification and contract tests to cover expected semantics 
of the InputStream single-byte and multi-byte read methods:
   
   * Multi-byte read should validate the arguments passed to it, according to 
the patterns established in the JDK base `InputStream` class and HDFS 
`DFSInputStream`.
   * You should get the same bytes whether going through single-byte or 
multi-byte read.
   * It is legal to mix calls to single-byte and multi-byte read, and this 
should also yield the same bytes.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   I ran all subclasses of `AbstractContractOpenTest` for local, HDFS and S3A 
(connecting to GCS's S3-compatible XML API).
   
   ```
   mvn -o \
       -pl 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common,hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs,hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf,hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws
 test \
       
-Dtest=TestFTPContractOpen,TestHDFSContractOpen,TestRouterHDFSContractOpenSecure,TestRouterWebHDFSContractOpen,TestRouterHDFSContractOpen,ITestS3AContractOpen,TestLocalFSContractOpen,TestRawlocalContractOpen
   ```
   
   I generated the site locally and confirmed the new specification content.
   
   ```
   mvn -o site site:stage -Preleasedocs,docs -DstagingDirectory=/tmp/hadoop-site
   ```
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [X] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
   - [X] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   




> Expand specification and contract test coverage for InputStream reads.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-19400
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19400
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: documentation, fs, test
>            Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>            Assignee: Chris Nauroth
>            Priority: Major
>
> This issue is a spin-off from HADOOP-19389, specifically [this code review 
> discussion|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7291#discussion_r1920495312].
>  We can enhance the FS specification and contract tests to cover expected 
> semantics of the {{InputStream}} single-byte and multi-byte read methods:
> * Multi-byte read should validate the arguments passed to it, according to 
> the pattern established in the JDK base {{InputStream}} class.
> * You should get the same bytes whether going through single-byte or 
> multi-byte read.
> * It is legal to mix calls to single-byte and multi-byte read, and this 
> should also yield the same bytes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to