Arun Ravi M V created HADOOP-17694:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Unable to use OAuth authentication at storage account
level if the default authn type is Custom
Key: HADOOP-17694
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17694
Project: Hadoop Common
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: fs/azure, tools
Affects Versions: 3.3.0
Reporter: Arun Ravi M V
If we set the default auth type as Custom and then decided to use OAuth type
for some select storage accounts then the fs initialization for storage
accounts with Oauth type authn fails.
Steps to recreate
{code:java}
conf.set("fs.abfss.impl",
"org.apache.hadoop.fs.azurebfs.SecureAzureBlobFileSystem")
conf.set("fs.azure.account.auth.type", "Custom")
conf.set("fs.azure.account.oauth.provider.type", "xxx.yyy.zzz.ADTokenAdaptee")
conf.set("fs.azure.account.auth.type.prdarionjoblogscribede0.dfs.core.windows.net",
"OAuth")
conf.set("fs.azure.account.oauth.provider.type.abctest.dfs.core.windows.net",
"org.apache.hadoop.fs.azurebfs.oauth2.MsiTokenProvider")
val fs = FileSystem.get(
new
URI("abfs://[email protected]/arion-scribe-de-dev"),
conf)
{code}
Error: java.lang.RuntimeException: class xxx.yyy.zzz.ADTokenAdaptee not
org.apache.hadoop.fs.azurebfs.oauth2.AccessTokenProvider
Cause:
In [AbfsConfiguration.
getTokenProvider|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/aa96f1871bfd858f9bac59cf2a81ec470da649af/hadoop-tools/hadoop-azure/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/azurebfs/AbfsConfiguration.java#L540]
, after evaluating the auth type as OAuth, the program proceeds to get the
implementing class using property `fs.azure.account.oauth.provider.type`,
while doing so the first
[step|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/aa96f1871bfd858f9bac59cf2a81ec470da649af/hadoop-tools/hadoop-azure/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/azurebfs/AbfsConfiguration.java#L321]
is to get the default auth class, which in our case is Custom. Here the
problem is Default Auth class is CustomTokenProviderAdaptee implementation and
not implementing AccessTokenProvider.class, hence program would fail.
proposed solution:
In the getClass function in AbfsConfiguration, we split the logic and not use
the default value property
{code:java}
public <U> Class<? extends U> getClass(String name, Class<? extends U>
defaultValue, Class<U> xface) {
Class<? extends U> klass = rawConfig.getClass(accountConf(name),
null, xface);
if(klass!=null){
return klass;
}else{
return rawConfig.getClass(name, defaultValue, xface);
}
}
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]