[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16926445#comment-16926445
]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-13363:
-----------------------------------------
I like the shaded JAR, with two caveats
* Release process: can it be issued by the ASF?
* shading complicates CVE tracking. We need to have a process for listing what
is shaded. Maybe by creating some manifest file, after agreeing with our peer
projects what such a manifest could look like
* at some point soon -2020?- we will have to think about making java 9 the
minimum version for branch-3. At which point we can all embrace java 9 modules.
I don't want to box us in for maintaining a shaded JAR forever in that world
> Upgrade protobuf from 2.5.0 to something newer
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-13363
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13363
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1, 3.0.0-alpha2
> Reporter: Allen Wittenauer
> Assignee: Vinayakumar B
> Priority: Major
> Labels: security
> Attachments: HADOOP-13363.001.patch, HADOOP-13363.002.patch,
> HADOOP-13363.003.patch, HADOOP-13363.004.patch, HADOOP-13363.005.patch
>
>
> Standard protobuf 2.5.0 does not work properly on many platforms. (See, for
> example, https://gist.github.com/BennettSmith/7111094 ). In order for us to
> avoid crazy work arounds in the build environment and the fact that 2.5.0 is
> starting to slowly disappear as a standard install-able package for even
> Linux/x86, we need to either upgrade or self bundle or something else.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
