[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15485046#comment-15485046
]
Ravi Prakash commented on HADOOP-10075:
---------------------------------------
bq. IMO we'd be better off moving out of Jetty and into jersey as the server;
this would eliminate jersey version problems altogether, and more importantly,
jersey "quirks"
For those of us less familiar with Jersey, could you please elaborate on this
Steve? Or did you mean "this would eliminate *jetty* version problems
altogether" ? Or does Jersey promise never to change its API ever?
In any case we can always make that happen later, so we shouldn't block the
upgrade of an old and crufty Jetty if someone wants to do it.
> Update jetty dependency to version 9
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10075
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10075
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.2.0, 2.6.0
> Reporter: Robert Rati
> Assignee: Robert Kanter
> Attachments: HADOOP-10075-002-wip.patch, HADOOP-10075.patch
>
>
> Jetty6 is no longer maintained. Update the dependency to jetty9.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
