[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15212372#comment-15212372
]
Larry McCay commented on HADOOP-12942:
--------------------------------------
I see that I did misunderstand your conclusion earlier. I apologize for that.
I don't see any point in prompting for a password that will successfully create
a keystore and not fail until access is attempted from a running MR job.
I think that the core issue can be addressed with a warning at credential
creation time that the default password is being used and that they might want
to consider provisioning a password in a file and add that filename to the
config.
Current behavior + what we should consider best practice according to this JIRA
is:
1. provision a password to a file for your credential providers
2. set this file location as the configured password file (really part of
provisioning above...)
3. use the hadoop credential CLI to provision the actual credential required by
MR jobs, etc
4. if default password is used warning the user
The combination of the warning from the CLI and better documentation should be
all that we need here.
I wouldn't be opposed to a -strict switch that doesn't allow the default
password to be used either.
So, when that is set we don't fallback to the default but fail out of the CLI
with appropriate error message.
An explicit switch to be -strict about it retains backward compatibility too.
Prompting for a password that has not been provisioned yet will lead to runtime
problems.
> hadoop credential commands non-obviously use password of "none"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-12942
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12942
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
> Reporter: Mike Yoder
> Assignee: Mike Yoder
> Attachments: HADOOP-12942.001.patch
>
>
> The "hadoop credential create" command, when using a jceks provider, defaults
> to using the value of "none" for the password that protects the jceks file.
> This is not obvious in the command or in documentation - to users or to other
> hadoop developers - and leads to jceks files that essentially are not
> protected.
> In this example, I'm adding a credential entry with name of "foo" and a value
> specified by the password entered:
> {noformat}
> # hadoop credential create foo -provider localjceks://file/bar.jceks
> Enter password:
> Enter password again:
> foo has been successfully created.
> org.apache.hadoop.security.alias.LocalJavaKeyStoreProvider has been updated.
> {noformat}
> However, the password that protects the file bar.jceks is "none", and there
> is no obvious way to change that. The practical way of supplying the password
> at this time is something akin to
> {noformat}
> HADOOP_CREDSTORE_PASSWORD=credpass hadoop credential create --provider ...
> {noformat}
> That is, stuffing HADOOP_CREDSTORE_PASSWORD into the environment of the
> command.
> This is more than a documentation issue. I believe that the password ought to
> be _required_. We have three implementations at this point, the two
> JavaKeystore ones and the UserCredential. The latter is "transient" which
> does not make sense to use in this context. The former need some sort of
> password, and it's relatively easy to envision that any non-transient
> implementation would need a mechanism by which to protect the store that it's
> creating.
> The implementation gets interesting because the password in the
> AbstractJavaKeyStoreProvider is determined in the constructor, and changing
> it after the fact would get messy. So this probably means that the
> CredentialProviderFactory should have another factory method like the first
> that additionally takes the password, and an additional constructor exist in
> all the implementations that takes the password.
> Then we just ask for the password in getCredentialProvider() and that gets
> passed down to via the factory to the implementation. The code does have
> logic in the factory to try multiple providers, but I don't really see how
> multiple providers would be rationaly be used in the command shell context.
> This issue was brought to light when a user stored credentials for a Sqoop
> action in Oozie; upon trying to figure out where the password was coming from
> we discovered it to be the default value of "none".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
