[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15179718#comment-15179718
 ] 

Thomas Demoor commented on HADOOP-11687:
----------------------------------------

This should also fix another bug. The current clone implementation also copies 
reponse headers (f.i. ETag, Accept-Ranges) from the source object to the new 
copy request. AWS can handle these superfluous headers but other 
implementations might not handle this well. 

Looks OK at fist glance, slight concerns:
* have we got everything? Will review in more detail later.
* we'll need to keep this up to date with every AWS version bump (check if they 
have added / changed something).

> Ignore x-emc-* headers when copying an Amazon S3 object
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-11687
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11687
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fs/s3
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.0
>            Reporter: Denis Jannot
>         Attachments: HADOOP-11687.001.patch
>
>
> The EMC ViPR/ECS object storage platform uses proprietary headers starting by 
> x-emc-* (like Amazon does with x-amz-*).
> Headers starting by x-emc-* should be included in the signature computation, 
> but it's not done by the Amazon S3 Java SDK (it's done by the EMC S3 SDK).
> When s3a copy an object it copies all the headers, but when the object 
> includes x-emc-* headers, it generates a signature mismatch.
> Removing the x-emc-* headers from the copy would allow s3a to be compatible 
> with the EMC ViPR/ECS object storage platform.
> Removing the x-* which aren't x-amz-* headers from the copy would allow s3a 
> to be compatible with any object storage platform which is using proprietary 
> headers



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to