[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15081298#comment-15081298
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8967:
-----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 4s {color} 
| {color:red} HADOOP-8967 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12728282/HADOOP-8967.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-8967 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/8336/console |


This message was automatically generated.



> Reported source for config property can be misleading
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-8967
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8967
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: conf
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.3
>            Reporter: Jason Lowe
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: BB2015-05-TBR
>         Attachments: HADOOP-8967.patch, HADOOP-8967.txt
>
>
> Configuration.set tries to track the source of a property being set, but it 
> mistakenly reports properties as being deprecated when they are not.  This is 
> misleading and confusing for users examining a job's configuration.
> For example, run a sleep job and check the job configuration on the job UI.  
> The source for the "mapreduce.job.maps" property will be reported as "job.xml 
> ⬅ because mapreduce.job.maps is deprecated".  This leads users to think 
> mapreduce.job.maps is now a deprecated property and wonder what other 
> property they should use instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to