[zeppelin] branch branch-0.8 updated: [ZEPPELIN-4580] check the instance type rather than the class name

[zjffdu]

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

zjffdu pushed a commit to branch branch-0.8
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/zeppelin.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/branch-0.8 by this push:
     new 7e4efb7  [ZEPPELIN-4580] check the instance type rather than the class 
name
7e4efb7 is described below

commit 7e4efb7652c56c0efc1eb6fc3738cd86ab7e6f12
Author: Jeff Hammel <j...@leapyear.io>
AuthorDate: Tue Feb 11 09:36:33 2020 -0800

    [ZEPPELIN-4580] check the instance type rather than the class name
    
    ### What is this PR for?
    A few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits.
    First time? Check out the contributing guide - 
https://zeppelin.apache.org/contribution/contributions.html
    
    This checks if the realm is an instance of KnoxJwtRealm instead of checking 
for it by name to enable subclassing of KnoxJwtRealm.
    
    ### What type of PR is it?
    [Bug Fix]
    
    ### Todos
    * [ ] - Task
    
    ### What is the Jira issue?
    * Open an issue on Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN/
    * Put link here, and add [ZEPPELIN-*Jira number*] in PR title, eg. 
[ZEPPELIN-533]
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-4580
    
    ### How should this be tested?
    * First time? Setup Travis CI as described on 
https://zeppelin.apache.org/contribution/contributions.html#continuous-integration
    * Strongly recommended: add automated unit tests for any new or changed 
behavior
    * Outline any manual steps to test the PR here.
    
    I have tested this change manually with a custom authenticator in an 
integrated environment.  JWT authentication works.
    
    I have also set up Travis.  A run is at 
https://travis-ci.org/LeapYear/zeppelin-source/builds/649031975 but there seem 
to be several errors unrelated to this change.
    
    ### Screenshots (if appropriate)
    
    ### Questions:
    * Does the licenses files need update?
    No
    * Is there breaking changes for older versions?
    No
    * Does this needs documentation?
    No
    
    Author: Jeff Hammel <j...@leapyear.io>
    
    Closes #3618 from jeff-hammel-leapyear/jeff/knox_instanceof and squashes 
the following commits:
    
    3909846f8 [Jeff Hammel] remove now unused references to name
    00c3d7dae [Jeff Hammel] check the instance type rather than the class name
---
 .../src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/rest/LoginRestApi.java   | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git 
a/zeppelin-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/rest/LoginRestApi.java 
b/zeppelin-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/rest/LoginRestApi.java
index 8d96188..dbb15f3 100644
--- a/zeppelin-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/rest/LoginRestApi.java
+++ b/zeppelin-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/rest/LoginRestApi.java
@@ -105,11 +105,7 @@ public class LoginRestApi {
     if (realmsList != null) {
       for (Iterator<Realm> iterator = realmsList.iterator(); 
iterator.hasNext(); ) {
         Realm realm = iterator.next();
-        String name = realm.getClass().getName();
-
-        LOG.debug("RealmClass.getName: " + name);
-
-        if (name.equals("org.apache.zeppelin.realm.jwt.KnoxJwtRealm")) {
+        if (realm instanceof KnoxJwtRealm) {
           return (KnoxJwtRealm) realm;
         }
       }
@@ -122,9 +118,7 @@ public class LoginRestApi {
     if (realmsList != null) {
       for (Iterator<Realm> iterator = realmsList.iterator(); 
iterator.hasNext(); ) {
         Realm realm = iterator.next();
-        String name = realm.getClass().getName();
-        LOG.debug("RealmClass.getName: " + name);
-        if (name.equals("org.apache.zeppelin.realm.jwt.KnoxJwtRealm")) {
+        if (realm instanceof KnoxJwtRealm) {
           return true;
         }
       }