This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
lukaszlenart pushed a commit to branch small-fixes
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/struts-site.git
commit 8f0e96ef19e58c8cd331e77df8157fd1f5f854e7
Author: Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>
AuthorDate: Fri Oct 18 15:26:35 2019 +0200
Drops unneeded .html suffix
---
source/tag-developers/freemarker-tags.md | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/source/tag-developers/freemarker-tags.md
b/source/tag-developers/freemarker-tags.md
index 421a850..54fe87f 100644
--- a/source/tag-developers/freemarker-tags.md
+++ b/source/tag-developers/freemarker-tags.md
@@ -9,14 +9,14 @@ title: Tag Developers Guide
* Will be replaced with the ToC, excluding a header
{:toc}
-FreeMarker tags are extensions of the generic [Struts Tags](struts-tags.html)
provided by the framework. You can jump
+FreeMarker tags are extensions of the generic [Struts Tags](struts-tags)
provided by the framework. You can jump
right in just by knowing the generic structure in which the tags can be
accessed:
```ftl
<@s.tag> ...</@s.tag>
```
-, where `tag` is any of the [tags](tags.html) supported by the framework.
+, where `tag` is any of the [tags](tags) supported by the framework.
For example, in JSP you might create a form using Struts tags.
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ pages even easier to code. You can even invoke third-party
JSP taglibs as if the
## Attributes and Parameters
-Unlike older versions of JSP (in which the [JSP Tags](jsp-tags.html) are
based), FreeMarker allows for _dynamic attributes_,
+Unlike older versions of JSP (in which the [JSP Tags](jsp-tags) are based),
FreeMarker allows for _dynamic attributes_,
much like JSP 2.0. You can supply attributes to the tags that the tag doesn't
explicitedly support. Those attributes
that cannot be applied directly to the tag object will be set to the tag's
general-purpose `parameters` Map.
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ FreeMarker which provides more advanced ways to apply
attributes. Suppose the fo
What will happen here is that each attribute will be evaluated to a String as
best it can. This may involve calling the
`toString` method on the internal FreeMarker objects. In this case, all
objects will end up being exactly what you would
-expect. Then, when the tag runs, the `list` attribute will be converted from a
String to a List using [OGNL](ogn.html)'s
+expect. Then, when the tag runs, the `list` attribute will be converted from a
String to a List using [OGNL](ognl)'s
advanced collection support.
But suppose you wish to use FreeMarker's list or hash support instead? You can
do this:
