Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change 
notification.

The following page has been changed by MartinCooper:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsAction1Planning

The comment on the change is:
Typos.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  There are three major issues with supporting JSR-168 (and probably a bunch of 
smaller ones as well):
  
-     * The framrwork APIs assume servlet API objects (!ServletContext, 
!ServletRequest, !ServletResponse), whereas JSR-168 talks about 
!PortletContext, !PortletRequest, and !PortletResponse. We'd either need to 
change the calling sequence for Action.execute() -- problematic for backwards 
compatibility -- or fake it somehow in a portlet environment.
+     * The framework APIs assume servlet API objects (!ServletContext, 
!ServletRequest, !ServletResponse), whereas JSR-168 talks about 
!PortletContext, !PortletRequest, and !PortletResponse. We'd either need to 
change the calling sequence for Action.execute() -- problematic for backwards 
compatibility -- or fake it somehow in a portlet environment.
      * The lifecycle of a portlet request is actually divided into two chunks 
-- processing and then rendering. From a Struts perspective, that means making 
sure that the first part of the request processor pipeline need to happen in 
the "process" part, and the forwarding to the resulting page needs to happen in 
the "render" part.
      * Today, Struts owns the process of calculating URLs for pages and 
actions. Because it's in a webapp, it knows exactly what to do for the 
developer. However, in a portlet container it's actually the portal server that 
manages URLs, so a Struts-based portlet would need to interact with the portlet 
APIs for this purpose.
  
- A strong goal should be that an application should be usable either as a 
webapp or as a portlet, with little (ideally no) changes. Therefore, we should 
build whatever it takes to support this into the standard framework 
distribution, which could then be used in both environments.
+ A strong goal should be that an application should be usable either as a 
webapp or as a portlet, with few (ideally no) changes. Therefore, we should 
build whatever it takes to support this into the standard framework 
distribution, which could then be used in both environments.
  
  == Relevant Proposals ==
  

Reply via email to