yashmayya commented on code in PR #14110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14110#discussion_r1869508969


##########
pinot-controller/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/controller/cursors/ResponseStoreCleaner.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.pinot.controller.cursors;
+
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.type.TypeReference;
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.net.URI;
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Properties;
+import java.util.concurrent.CompletionService;
+import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
+import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
+import java.util.function.Function;
+import java.util.stream.Collectors;
+import org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils;
+import org.apache.commons.lang3.tuple.Pair;
+import org.apache.hc.client5.http.classic.methods.HttpDelete;
+import org.apache.hc.client5.http.classic.methods.HttpGet;
+import org.apache.hc.client5.http.classic.methods.HttpUriRequestBase;
+import org.apache.hc.client5.http.impl.io.PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager;
+import org.apache.hc.core5.http.io.entity.EntityUtils;
+import org.apache.helix.model.InstanceConfig;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.auth.AuthProviderUtils;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.http.MultiHttpRequest;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.http.MultiHttpRequestResponse;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.metrics.ControllerMetrics;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.response.CursorResponse;
+import org.apache.pinot.common.response.broker.CursorResponseNative;
+import org.apache.pinot.controller.ControllerConf;
+import org.apache.pinot.controller.LeadControllerManager;
+import org.apache.pinot.controller.api.resources.InstanceInfo;
+import org.apache.pinot.controller.helix.core.PinotHelixResourceManager;
+import 
org.apache.pinot.controller.helix.core.periodictask.ControllerPeriodicTask;
+import org.apache.pinot.spi.auth.AuthProvider;
+import org.apache.pinot.spi.utils.CommonConstants;
+import org.apache.pinot.spi.utils.JsonUtils;
+import org.apache.pinot.spi.utils.TimeUtils;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+
+
+/**
+ * ResponseStoreCleaner periodically gets all responses stored in a response 
store and deletes the ones that have
+ * expired. From each broker, tt gets the list of responses. Each of the 
response has an expiration unix timestamp.
+ * If the current timestamp is greater, it calls a DELETE API for every 
response that has expired.
+ */
+public class ResponseStoreCleaner extends ControllerPeriodicTask<Void> {
+  private static final Logger LOGGER = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(ResponseStoreCleaner.class);
+  private static final int TIMEOUT_MS = 3000;
+  private static final String QUERY_RESULT_STORE = "%s://%s:%d/responseStore";
+  private static final String DELETE_QUERY_RESULT = 
"%s://%s:%d/responseStore/%s";
+  // Used in tests to trigger the delete instead of waiting for the wall clock 
to move to an appropriate time.
+  public static final String CLEAN_AT_TIME = 
"response.store.cleaner.clean.at.ms";

Review Comment:
   I'm not sure I get the point about flakiness - we're already using a wait 
that periodically checks with a 100 second timeout right? So if we set the 
cleaner run frequency to a much smaller number like 5 seconds that shouldn't 
result in test flakiness right?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to