rohityadav1993 commented on issue #9154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/9154#issuecomment-1745563314

   We have a requirement to use a different analyzer other than the standard 
analyzer.
   
   @kkrugler, I see this as a problem with two aspects: static analyzer and 
dynamic analyzer per field.
   The former is easier to solve, using an analyzer class name(Lucene or custom 
provided)
   For the latter, it can be solved separately and may involve a little more 
designing:
   1. Detector: detect which analyzer to use for the given text
   2. AnalyzerFactory: provide an analyzer instance based on detector's result.
   3. Configuration: Tricky, as it is hard to generalize. But the idea is how 
to set up detector which identifies the analyzer for the field's value.
   
   It can be a quick win if we can start with solving the former case while 
working on the latter's design. Will be interested in helping here.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to