egalpin commented on issue #10712:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/10712#issuecomment-1734134107

   @mcvsubbu I think the idea is that if multiple physical OFFLINE tables and 
multiple physical REALTIME tables could be composed into a single logical 
table, including maintaining the notion of a timeBoundary, then the segment 
count limitation could be mitigated by adding additional physical OFFLINE or 
REALTIME tables and including them in the "logical hybrid" table.
   
   I think it would be a great idea to eventually have hybrid tables 
represented using the same concept of physical/logical table so that hybrid 
tables would be less of a special case.  That said, I think it might be worth 
separating that work into a distinct follow-up outside the scope of initially 
introducing physical/logical table feature.
   
   I'll try to capture the conversation so far here into a design doc to better 
allow organization of requirements, intentional punts/anti-features/follow-up 
features, as well as a place to share design ideas once we settle requirements.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to