Jackie-Jiang commented on issue #10712:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/10712#issuecomment-1732157518

   We need some design around this, and here is what comes into my mind as of 
now:
   - We maintain a mapping from logical table to physical tables (1-n), and we 
can change this mapping on the fly. Broker should be able to pick it up 
atomically
   - To solve the hybrid table, we can consider adding multiple hierarchies of 
logical tables, where one logical table type maintains the offline real-time 
table relation (time boundary maintained), and we can have mapping from logical 
table to logical table mixed with physical table


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to