Jackie-Jiang commented on issue #10712: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/10712#issuecomment-1732157518
We need some design around this, and here is what comes into my mind as of now: - We maintain a mapping from logical table to physical tables (1-n), and we can change this mapping on the fly. Broker should be able to pick it up atomically - To solve the hybrid table, we can consider adding multiple hierarchies of logical tables, where one logical table type maintains the offline real-time table relation (time boundary maintained), and we can have mapping from logical table to logical table mixed with physical table -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org