sajjad-moradi commented on issue #11276: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/11276#issuecomment-1673575018
> Support for quota for ingestion is best done through ingestion rate quota, which is already supported. Coupled with retention, this config can help determine how much data is stored for a table. > > Storage quota cannot be really enforced if the ingestion rate starts to increase. I think this is very use case dependent. If the queries issued to the real-time table need to scan data over a fixed period (e.g., the last three months), it's imperative that the time retention of the table to exceed that window. This would make storage-based retention configurations less applicable for such a table. On the other hand, if a table doesn't have strict query-time requirements, a storage-based quota could indeed be a good fit. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
