walterddr commented on code in PR #11023:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/11023#discussion_r1273763818
##########
pinot-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/broker/requesthandler/MultiStageBrokerRequestHandler.java:
##########
@@ -247,6 +247,12 @@ private BrokerResponse handleRequest(long requestId,
String query, @Nullable Sql
// find a way to split metrics in case of multiple table
String rawTableName =
TableNameBuilder.extractRawTableName(tableNames.iterator().next());
entry.getValue().setStageLevelStats(rawTableName, brokerResponseStats,
_brokerMetrics);
+
+ // Track number of queries with number of groups limit reached
+ if (brokerResponse.isNumGroupsLimitReached()) {
Review Comment:
ok so the idea is to use default table or a opaque table if the
groupLimitExceeded flag is set and unable to determine which table -- the
benefit is to compute how many of these actually reached. but not to fine-grain
control the signaling on which table.
I am ok with this as long as we are clear with the terminology
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
