gortiz commented on code in PR #10953: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/10953#discussion_r1241627784
########## pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/operator/filter/PrioritizedFilterOperator.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ +package org.apache.pinot.core.operator.filter; + +import java.util.OptionalInt; +import org.apache.pinot.core.common.Block; +import org.apache.pinot.core.common.Operator; + + +/** + * Operators that implements this interface can define how to be sorted in an AND, as defined in + * {@link FilterOperatorUtils.Implementation#}. + */ +public interface PrioritizedFilterOperator<T extends Block> extends Operator<T> { + + int HIGH_PRIORITY = 0; Review Comment: > Bucketizing in High/Medium/Low might be too coarse grain? Totally, but these are the values we are currently using. I initially multiplied the numbers by 100, but finally decided to keep the same values in order to keep this PR as simple as possible. I guess we can do the change here given that is not just me the one that though about that. The number is only used in an anonymous comparator, so I don't imagine it may have an actual impact. > If so, how would the relative ordering be defined? The number is only used in a comparator, so if two operators have the same weight, it means they the order between them is not going to be always the same. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org