abhioncbr commented on code in PR #10814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/10814#discussion_r1224908703
##########
pinot-query-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/query/type/TypeSystem.java:
##########
@@ -70,4 +70,16 @@ public RelDataType deriveAvgAggType(RelDataTypeFactory
typeFactory,
}
}
}
+
+ // overriding the function for handling comparison between different data
types.
+ // based on the precision value calcite adds the CAST function to make
operands of same type for comparison.
+ @Override public int getDefaultPrecision(SqlTypeName typeName) {
+ switch (typeName) {
+ case DOUBLE:
+ return 16;
+ default:
+ // Following BasicSqlType precision as the default
+ return super.getDefaultPrecision(typeName);
+ }
Review Comment:
Well, I changed the `TypeFactory` extending`SqlTypeFactoryImpl` instead of
`JavaTypeFactoryImpl`, and there is no effect on our test suite. Here are the
[changes](https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/10883).
I will say either our test suite isn't complete to cover complete testing or
it doesn't matter if we extend either type. Let me look `TypeCoercion` logic.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
