gortiz commented on code in PR #10715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/10715#discussion_r1185741967


##########
pinot-segment-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/segment/spi/index/IndexReaderFactory.java:
##########
@@ -45,6 +45,18 @@ R createIndexReader(SegmentDirectory.Reader segmentReader, 
FieldIndexConfigs fie
     protected abstract R createIndexReader(PinotDataBuffer dataBuffer, 
ColumnMetadata metadata, C indexConfig)
         throws IOException, IndexReaderConstraintException;
 
+    /**
+     * Sometimes the index configuration indicates that the index should be 
disabled but the reader actually contains
+     * a buffer for the index type.
+     *
+     * By default, the buffer has priority over the configuration, so in case 
we have a buffer we would create an index

Review Comment:
   But do we want to keep the previous behavior or do we want to be resilient 
in cases where the table config says one thing and the metainfo says otherwise? 
If we are going to decide what to do in the general case (in IndexType) based 
on what PhysicalColumnIndexContainer did, we should offer the two options (use 
config or use metainfo) and let the caller decide.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to