gortiz commented on PR #10372:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/10372#issuecomment-1458498923

   Ok, but that is not achieving that much from what I've got. I mean, yes, 
with your option the window size can be changed in other cases. I still think 
that the buffer should be managed by the caller, but your option require less 
changes, so lets use that. In my specific case I know the custom window size 
when the Operator is created, so it doesn't hurt me.
   
   But in my use case I would also need to be able to `applyAnd` using an 
iterator. I have this `applyAnd` that receives ` BatchIterator` but does not 
include the batch size


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to