walterddr commented on issue #8474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/issues/8474#issuecomment-1090346117

   correct. i guess we might need to keep the PinotFSFactory storing not just 
the scheme as the hash key but scheme + host of the URI.
   
   I haven't thought this through with all the FS that we support so i guess 
some investigation on 
   - is scheme + host enough for our use cases; and is there unnecessary 
overhead for other FS types (e.g. `file://`?)
   - how to fallback to scheme only? (e.g. if one decided to create another 
pinotFS but reused the same PinotFS instances of the scheme previously defined)
   - 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to