weixiangsun commented on pull request #8029: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/8029#issuecomment-1053738973
> High level question: Since the gap-fill is always processed on the broker side, will it be simpler if we always rewrite the query on the broker side to trim off the gap-fill part, so that no change is required on the server side? Another benefit of this approach is that this can eliminate the overhead of parsing sub-queries and processing gap-fill again on the servers. If the gap-fill part is trimmed off, it is hard to tell if this is gapfill query in case of Gapfill Type query. We do not parse the sub-queries and processing gap-fill again on servers. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
