npawar commented on a change in pull request #7921:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/7921#discussion_r771549152



##########
File path: 
pinot-segment-local/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/segment/local/utils/TableConfigUtils.java
##########
@@ -330,8 +333,8 @@ static void validateTaskConfigs(TableConfig tableConfig, 
Schema schema) {
         // TODO task specific validate logic should directly call to 
PinotTaskGenerator API
         if (taskTypeConfigName.equals(REALTIME_TO_OFFLINE_TASK_TYPE)) {
           // check table is not upsert
-          Preconditions.checkState(tableConfig.getUpsertMode() == 
UpsertConfig.Mode.NONE,
-              "RealtimeToOfflineTask doesn't support upsert ingestion mode!");
+          Preconditions.checkState(tableConfig.getUpsertMode() == 
UpsertConfig.Mode.NONE || taskTypeConfig.containsKey(

Review comment:
       my thought was that we should provide it as an API param. We might 
extend this in future to skip all sorts of validations, which will not be 
limited to things in taskConfigs.
   Previously from @Jackie-Jiang  as well
   ```
   To workaround the cases where user knows it doesn't work but still want to 
bypass the validation, we can add some skip validation rules as an additional 
parameter when updating table config/schema.
   ```




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to