cbalci opened a new pull request #7912: URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/7912
Reverts apache/pinot#7848 Hi @Manis99803 and @Jackie-Jiang, I'm proposing a revert here since I don't think this is the right way to calculate the storage quota for a dimension tables. Dimension tables, by design, are expected to be distributed to all the servers in a tenant so there is not much value in multiplying the size with server count. Using this logic, a table which used to satisfy quota requirements will exceed the limit even if you simply add more servers to a tenant, which is counterintuitive. Server administrators may need to update quota limits for all dimension tables with cluster size changes, which can be cumbersome. I propose keeping the old notation where the quota value represents the limit for a single replica of the table, which is easier to reason about. Let me know what you think -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org
