siddharthteotia commented on a change in pull request #5538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/5538#discussion_r440490826



##########
File path: 
pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/query/executor/ServerQueryExecutorV1Impl.java
##########
@@ -205,8 +205,9 @@ public DataTable processQuery(ServerQueryRequest 
queryRequest, ExecutorService e
         metadata.put(DataTable.NUM_SEGMENTS_MATCHED, "0");
       } else {
         TimerContext.Timer planBuildTimer = 
timerContext.startNewPhaseTimer(ServerQueryPhase.BUILD_QUERY_PLAN);
-        Plan globalQueryPlan =
-            _planMaker.makeInterSegmentPlan(segmentDataManagers, 
brokerRequest, executorService, remainingTimeMs);
+        Plan globalQueryPlan = _planMaker
+            .makeInterSegmentPlan(segmentDataManagers, 
queryContext.getBrokerRequest(), executorService,
+                remainingTimeMs);

Review comment:
       Is this because of step by step migration to QueryContext? We have 
already converted BrokerRequest to QueryContext at this point but for code that 
hasn't yet switched to QueryContext, a backward reference to broker request is 
still maintained inside QueryRequest to help with components that will still 
use BrokerRequest. Is this correct?




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to