deepthi912 commented on code in PR #18020:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/18020#discussion_r3013792572
##########
pinot-segment-local/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/segment/local/indexsegment/immutable/ImmutableSegmentImpl.java:
##########
@@ -160,13 +159,14 @@ public void persistDocIdsSnapshot(String fileName,
ThreadSafeMutableRoaringBitma
LOGGER.warn("Previous snapshot was not taken cleanly. Remove tmp file:
{}", tmpFile);
FileUtils.deleteQuietly(tmpFile);
}
- MutableRoaringBitmap docIdsSnapshot = docIds.getMutableRoaringBitmap();
- try (DataOutputStream dataOutputStream = new DataOutputStream(new
FileOutputStream(tmpFile))) {
- docIdsSnapshot.serialize(dataOutputStream);
+ byte[] bytes = docIds.toBytes();
Review Comment:
Yeah I haven't seen any longer pause from the small benchmark I have taken .
Older code was completely cloning the bitmap. Atleast with that we reduce the
number of lock contentions as well as bytes which are eligible for gc
immediately. With off-heap memory:
It might not be worth it here:
Direct buffers are slower to allocate. ByteBuffer.allocateDirect() requires
a system call (mmap) and has higher per-allocation overhead. For a ~40KB buffer
created per segment, this would add overhead dominate any benefit. For maybe
larger bitmaps it might make sense but it doesn't explain the purpose. We might
just use it to save the heap memory and bring down heap overhead or long gc
pauses. I don't think in our scenario we had a long gc pause. @KKcorps correct
me if I am wrong.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
