Jackie-Jiang commented on PR #16879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/16879#issuecomment-3336106633

   Can we revert this one? The `numDocs` used in the PR is total docs in 
segment instead of docs being scanned, which is not a good indicator for 
scanning dictionary. I already discussed with @deepthi912 about the idea of 
caching matched dict ids


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to