[openoffice-project] branch preview/missing-pictures updated: switch from external url to relotive link

[petko]

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

petko pushed a commit to branch preview/missing-pictures
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice-project.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/preview/missing-pictures by 
this push:
     new 8e248bb  switch from external url to relotive link
8e248bb is described below

commit 8e248bbad0402ec265d3d1fa57b824082254c79b
Author: Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org>
AuthorDate: Thu Jun 8 10:42:26 2023 +0200

    switch from external url to relotive link
---
 content/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50.markdown  | 20 ++++++++++----------
 .../blog/developer_in_aoo_1year_celebration.markdown |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/content/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50.markdown 
b/content/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50.markdown
index b1ef43e..ff130f2 100644
--- a/content/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50.markdown
+++ b/content/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50.markdown
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ planning. <br /></p>
   <p>First a scatter plot of daily download numbers, with a 7-day moving 
average overlay.&nbsp; Noticeable on the chart is the peak in June 2012, when 
we enabled the upgrade notifications for OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 users, and the 
peak in September when Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 was released.&nbsp; There is 
also a noticeable summer lull and big drop around the end-of-year holidays.<br 
/></p> 
   <p><br /></p> 
   <p><br /></p> 
-  <p align="center"> <img 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_daily-downloads.png";
 alt="daily-downloads.png" /></p> 
+  <p align="center"> <img 
src="../images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_daily-downloads.png" 
alt="daily-downloads.png" /></p> 
   <p> </p> 
   <p align="left"> </p> 
   <p>The following histogram shows the distribution of download counts.&nbsp; 
The average daily download count is 134,900,&nbsp; with a peak day of 
197,500.&nbsp; On average we see around a million downloads every 7.4 
days.&nbsp; Since a typical download size is 
@@ -19,13 +19,13 @@ planning. <br /></p>
 ably handled by SourceForge and their distribution network. <br /></p> 
   <p> </p> 
   <p> </p> 
-  <p align="center"><img 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_histogram.png";
 alt="histogram.png" /></p> 
+  <p align="center"><img 
src="../images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_histogram.png" 
alt="histogram.png" /></p> 
   <p> </p> 
   <p align="left"> </p> 
   <p>&nbsp;One final way to look at the daily counts (shown here in unit of 
1000 downloads) is to decompose it into the sum of a smooth trend, a periodic 
weekly trend, and residual random noise:<br /></p> 
   <p> </p> 
   <p> </p> 
-  <p align="center"><img 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_decomposition.png";
 alt="decomposition.png" /></p> 
+  <p align="center"><img 
src="../images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_decomposition.png" 
alt="decomposition.png" /></p> 
   <p align="left"> </p> 
   <p>We are able to break down these trends along several other 
dimensions.&nbsp; One is by country, looking at where the download request came 
from.&nbsp; This information is gleaned from the IP address of the machine 
making the request.&nbsp; Since each IP address is part of an assigned block of 
addresses, and blocks are assigned geographically, we can create a table of 
downloads by country, territory, etc.&nbsp; We show the <a 
href="http://www.openoffice.org/stats/countries.html";>full [...]
   <p> </p> 
@@ -92,24 +92,24 @@ ably handled by SourceForge and their distribution network. 
<br /></p>
   <p>Another approach is to look at which localized versions of Apache 
OpenOffice were downloaded.&nbsp; We can see these trends in the following dot 
chart:</p> 
   <p> </p> 
   <p> </p> 
-  <p align="center"><img 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_languages.png";
 alt="languages.png" /></p> 
+  <p align="center"><img 
src="../images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_languages.png" 
alt="languages.png" /></p> 
   <p>We can also look at the trend over time of downloads by operating 
system.&nbsp;&nbsp; OpenOffice is a mainstream open source desktop application, 
so the OS distribution reflects overall desktop operating system market shares, 
and with a slight growth in Windows at the expense of Mac:<br /></p> 
-  <p align="center"><img 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_os-downloads.png";
 alt="os-downloads.png" /></p> 
+  <p align="center"><img 
src="../images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_os-downloads.png" 
alt="os-downloads.png" /></p> 
   <p>Since we have Linux versions of OpenOffice packed as RPMs (e.g., for 
RedHat) as well as DEBs (e.g., for Ubuntu), we can look for trends in the ratio 
of requests for these two packaging formats over time:<br /></p> 
-  <p align="center"> <img alt="packaging.png" 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_packaging.png";
 /></p> 
+  <p align="center"> <img alt="packaging.png" 
src="../images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_packaging.png" /></p> 
   <p> </p> 
   <p>Also, we have 32-bit and 64-bit Linux downloads, and we see a gradual 
increase in demand over time for the 64-bit version, though the 32-bit version 
still dominates.&nbsp; (The drop in July-September is not fully explained, but 
may have been an error in our download page that was not recommending 64-bit 
downloads appropriately.)<br /></p> 
-  <p align="center"> <img 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_64-bit.png";
 alt="64-bit.png" /></p> 
+  <p align="center"> <img 
src="../images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_64-bit.png" alt="64-bit.png" 
/></p> 
   <p> </p> 
   <p>Although we don't have detailed download data for different Windows 
versions (we have a single download for all Windows users) we do have 
information from website visitors (nearly 7 million visitors per month) that 
tells a similar story.&nbsp; Windows 7 remains the most popular Windows version 
for our users, accounting for over half of Windows visitors.&nbsp; Windows XP 
is in second place, though declining.&nbsp; At the end of the year Windows 8 
overtook Vista for 3rd place, and con [...]
   <p> </p> 
-  <p align="center"><img alt="windows-version.png" 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_windows.png";
 /></p> 
+  <p align="center"><img alt="windows-version.png" 
src="../images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_windows.png" /></p> 
   <p>Looking at the similar data for web browsers, we see the rise in Chrome 
users among our website visitors:<br /></p> 
-  <p align="center"><img 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_browsers.png";
 alt="browsers.png" /></p> 
+  <p align="center"><img 
src="../images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_browser.png" 
alt="browsers.png" /></p> 
   <p> </p> 
   <p>Information from website visitors also tells us their screen 
resolution.&nbsp; There is a huge diversity of screen resolutions, but the 
general trend is a gradual increase in HD 16:9 resolutions and away from the 
older 1280x800 and 1024x768 modes.&nbsp; If you average it all out and look at 
the average aspect ratio, you see a slow, but steady trend toward increased 
aspect ratios (wider screen monitors):</p> 
   <p> </p> 
-  <p align="center"> <img alt="aspect-ratio.png" 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_widescreen.png";
 /></p> 
+  <p align="center"> <img alt="aspect-ratio.png" 
src="../images/blog/apache_openoffice_one_year_50_widescreen.png" /></p> 
   <p> </p> 
   <p>The above charts were made in <a href="http://www.r-project.org/";>R</a>, 
using data from <a 
href="http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Download%20Stats%20API/";>SourceForge's
 REST API</a> and from Google Analytics.&nbsp;&nbsp; The processing of the 
SourceForge data was automated via a <a 
href="https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/aoo-stats/detail-by-day.py";>custom
 Python script</a>.<br /></p> 
   <p> </p> 
diff --git a/content/blog/developer_in_aoo_1year_celebration.markdown 
b/content/blog/developer_in_aoo_1year_celebration.markdown
index 6828271..cc02f02 100644
--- a/content/blog/developer_in_aoo_1year_celebration.markdown
+++ b/content/blog/developer_in_aoo_1year_celebration.markdown
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ permalink: developer_in_aoo_1year_celebration
   <table width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0"> 
     <tbody> 
       <tr> 
-        <td><img width="340" height="512" 
src="https://openoffice.apache.org/images/blog/Jan.jpeg"; alt="jan1.jpg" /></td> 
+        <td>
+        <img width="340" height="512" src="../images/blog/Jan.jpeg" 
alt="jan1.jpg" /></td> 
         <td> <br /></td> 
         <td> 
           <p>Many of the big open source software packages are to a high 
degree