This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

elharo pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/maven-site.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new ec0e785d Injection and Mojo tests now use Guice (#585)
ec0e785d is described below

commit ec0e785dd258fe017fb14844576800abf8b306ea
Author: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elh...@users.noreply.github.com>
AuthorDate: Sat Dec 7 13:01:19 2024 +0000

    Injection and Mojo tests now use Guice (#585)
    
    * Injection and Mojo tests now use Guice
---
 content/apt/plugin-developers/plugin-testing.apt | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/content/apt/plugin-developers/plugin-testing.apt 
b/content/apt/plugin-developers/plugin-testing.apt
index 958ab5ab..803342c2 100644
--- a/content/apt/plugin-developers/plugin-testing.apt
+++ b/content/apt/plugin-developers/plugin-testing.apt
@@ -48,13 +48,20 @@ Unit Tests
 
  In principle, you can write a unit test of a plugin Mojo the same way you'd 
write any other JUnit test case, by writing a class that <<<extends TestCase>>>.
 
- However, most mojos need more information to work properly.  For example, 
you'll probably need to inject a reference to a MavenProject, so your mojo can 
query project variables.
+ However, many mojo methods need more information to work properly. For 
example, you'll probably need to inject a reference
+ to a <<<MavenProject>>>, so your mojo can query project variables.
 
 * Using PlexusTestCase
 
- Mojo variables are injected using Plexus, and many Mojos are written to take 
specific advantage of the Plexus container (by executing a lifecycle or having 
various injected dependencies).
-
- If all you need are Plexus container services, you can write your class with 
<<<extends PlexusTestCase>>> instead of TestCase.
+ Mojo variables are injected by Guice, sometimes with a Plexus adapter to 
support the legacy <<<@Component>>> annotation.
+ Currently some mojos are fully guicified with constructor 
+ injection, while others that have not yet been converted use Plexus field 
injection.
+ 
+ Both Guice-based and Plexus-based mojos rely on the Guice Plexus adapter to 
inject dependencies
+ by having the test class extend <<<PlexusTestCase>>> and calling the 
<<lookup()>>> method to instantiate the mojo.
+ Tests for fully Guicified mojos can also inject dependencies directly into  
the constructor without extending <<<PlexusTestCase>>>.
+ These dependencies can be Mockito mocks or instances of the actual model 
classes. If a particular test does not access the injected
+ field — that is, it's only injected to fulfill the constructor signature — 
you can usually also pass null as the value of that argument. 
 
  With that said, if you need to inject Maven objects into your mojo, you'll 
probably prefer to use the maven-plugin-testing-harness.
 
@@ -63,8 +70,8 @@ Unit Tests
  The 
{{{/plugin-testing/maven-plugin-testing-harness/}maven-plugin-testing-harness}}
  is explicitly intended to test the 
<<<org.apache.maven.reporting.AbstractMavenReport#execute()>>> implementation.
 
- In general, you need to include <<<maven-plugin-testing-harness>>> as a 
dependency,
- and create a *MojoTest (by convention) class which <<<extends 
AbstractMojoTestCase>>>.
+ In general, you need to include <<<maven-plugin-testing-harness>>> as a 
test-scoped dependency,
+ and create a MojoTest (by convention) class which <<<extends 
AbstractMojoTestCase>>>.
 
 +-----+
 ...
@@ -108,15 +115,18 @@ public class YourMojoTest
 }
 +-----+
 
- For more information, refer to 
{{{http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVENOLD/Maven+Plugin+Harness}Maven
 Plugin Harness Wiki}}
+ For more information, refer to 
{{{https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVENOLD/Maven+Plugin+Harness}Maven
 Plugin Harness Wiki}}
 
 Integration/Functional testing
 
 * maven-verifier
 
- maven-verifier tests are run using JUnit or TestNG, and provide a simple 
class allowing you to launch Maven and assert on its log file and built 
artifacts.  It also provides a ResourceExtractor, which extracts a Maven 
project from your src/test/resources directory into a temporary working 
directory where you can do tricky stuff with it. Follow the 
{{{/shared/maven-verifier/getting-started.html}Getting Started}} guide to learn 
more about creating maven-verifier tests.
+ maven-verifier tests are run using JUnit, and provide a simple class allowing 
you to launch Maven and assert on its log file and built artifacts.
+ It also provides a <<<ResourceExtractor>>>, which extracts a Maven project 
from the src/test/resources directory into a temporary working directory
+ where you can do tricky stuff with it. Follow the 
{{{/shared/maven-verifier/getting-started.html}Getting Started}} guide to learn 
more about creating 
+ maven-verifier tests.
 
- Maven itself uses maven-verifier to run its core integration tests.  For more 
information, please refer to 
{{{https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Creating+a+Maven+Integration+Test}Creating
 a Maven Integration Test}}.
+ Maven itself uses maven-verifier to run its core integration tests.  For more 
information, see 
{{{https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Creating+a+Maven+Integration+Test}Creating
 a Maven Integration Test}}.
 
  <<Note>>: maven-verifier and maven-verifier-plugin sound similar, but are 
totally different unrelated pieces of code.  maven-verifier-plugin simply 
verifies the existence/absence of files on the filesystem.  You could use it 
for functional testing, but you may need more features than 
maven-verifier-plugin provides.
 
@@ -127,7 +137,7 @@ Integration/Functional testing
  this way don't run under JUnit/TestNG; instead, they're run by Maven itself.
 
  You can take a look at the 
{{{https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-install-plugin/src/it/}maven-install-plugin}}
- how there are integration tests are written.
+ to see how integration tests are written.
 
 +-----+
 <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";

Reply via email to