mchades commented on code in PR #10720: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/10720#discussion_r3080027209
########## design-docs/iceberg-supported-nested-namespace.md: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ +# [Iceberg REST] Supported Nested Namespace Design + +## Background + +This document describes one practical solution to support Iceberg nested namespaces in Gravitino. +The scope is not only UI privilege granting, but also namespace mapping, identifier handling, +authorization scope, and compatibility behavior across Iceberg REST and Gravitino. + +References: + +- https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/main/docs/security/access-control.md +- https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/main/docs/iceberg-rest-service.md +- https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/main/docs/manage-relational-metadata-using-gravitino.md +- https://github.com/apache/gravitino/discussions/7296 + +## Goal + +- Support nested namespace operations from Iceberg REST to Gravitino through schema mapping. Review Comment: I noticed that Iceberg supports [namespace-separator.](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/87c743463b6311f2412e1addf19cf204c1b79e3d/open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml#L267). Should we consider this? Will it affect our design? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
