CalvinKirs commented on PR #68549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/68549#issuecomment-5866178327

   Local skill review completed at head: no Blocker or Major finding, two Minor 
and two Nit findings outstanding (none blocking). Full report: 
https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/68549#pullrequestreview-5335767986
   
   Round 1 ran the repo `code-review` skill the way the review runner does: a 
main-session pass, then two subagents over a shared ledger, one tracing every 
caller of `checkWithCookie` and the `/rest/v1` routing in both deployment 
modes, one on the unit test, the regression suite across cloud / TLS / multi-FE 
runs, and the description. The main session checked every candidate against the 
code and kept four. Round 2, attested below, was a further main-session pass 
over the whole diff at this head (check order in the Basic branch including the 
certificate path, parity with the cookie branch, login's identity on both 
branches, remaining `checkAuthWithCookie` callers, test isolation); it raised 
nothing new. The FE build, the unit tests and the regression suite were run on 
the base below.
   
   <!-- doris-repo-review:v1:begin -->
   ```yaml
   schema: doris-repo-review/v1
   status: PASS
   pr: apache/doris#68549
   commit: 7f278ac77c3a129925c3550378b6e49e90a71560
   base: eb50752c0216732ba69f0c04fdabd9b79ac7dda7
   reviewed_at: 2026-09-28T16:19:22+08:00
   reviewer: CalvinKirs
   model: claude-fable-5-1
   effort: xhigh
   findings: {blocker: 0, major: 0, minor: 2, nit: 2}
   rounds: 2
   converged: true
   ```
   <!-- doris-repo-review:v1:end -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to