jayakasadev opened a new pull request, #68352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/68352

   ### What problem does this PR solve?
   
   Issue Number: close #xxx
   
   Related PR: #68351 (stacked on top of it; this branch contains that commit)
   
   Problem Summary:
   
   `trivy image` on the published runtime images reports CRITICAL findings for 
two
   FE dependencies. Scanning apache/doris:fe-4.1.4, be-4.1.4 and ms-4.1.4 shows
   `netty-handler` and `bcprov-jdk18on` in every one of them, and the versions 
on
   master are still affected:
   
   Netty 4.2.15.Final -> 4.2.17.Final fixes two flaws in how the default SNI 
path
   handles fragmented TLS ClientHello records:
   
   - CVE-2026-75595 (CRITICAL): SNI routing bypass. A ClientHello split across 
TLS
     records makes SNI extraction fail, so the connection silently falls back 
to the
     default `SslContext` instead of the virtual host's, i.e. it can be served 
with
     the wrong certificate/trust configuration.
   - CVE-2026-75596: quadratic pre-handshake reassembly in the same parsing 
path,
     a pre-auth CPU DoS.
   
   Both sit in `netty-handler`, which backs the FE's TLS-terminating listeners
   (HTTP/8030 and Arrow Flight SQL), so they are reachable before 
authentication.
   
   Bouncy Castle 1.84 -> 1.85 fixes two flaws that the existing 1.84 pin (added 
for
   CVE-2025-14813 and friends) does not cover:
   
   - CVE-2026-8763 (CRITICAL): Name Constraints bypass via a trailing dot in
     `rfc822Name` and URI name forms, i.e. a certificate can escape the 
constraints
     an issuer set on it.
   - CVE-2026-13506: forcing a lazily-parsed ASN.1 sequence resets the
     nesting-depth guard, defeating the recursion limit on untrusted DER.
   
   Doris reaches Bouncy Castle through the Huawei OBS/IAM SDK in
   `fe-filesystem-obs`, which is on the certificate-validation path for that
   filesystem, so both are relevant.
   
   Confirmed against OSV that 4.2.17.Final and 1.85 carry no known advisories,
   while 4.2.15.Final has 2 and 1.84 has 2.
   
   Both are patch-level upgrades within the line already in use:
   
   - The Netty version flows through the `netty-bom` import in `fe/pom.xml`, so 
one
     property moves the whole aligned graph. `regression-test/framework/pom.xml`
     hardcodes `netty-all` instead of using the property, so it is bumped in 
step
     and a comment now records that coupling.
   - Arrow 19.0.0 (`arrow.version`) declares `dep.netty-bom.version` 
4.2.9.Final and
     takes its Netty deps unversioned from the BOM, so the FE override 
continues to
     apply; master was already 6 patch releases ahead at 4.2.15.Final. Verified 
the
     `netty-buffer` class surface Arrow allocates against is unchanged between
     4.2.15.Final and 4.2.17.Final.
   - Bouncy Castle point releases are API-stable and the pin is a managed 
override,
     so the OBS SDK keeps resolving against it.
   
   ### Release note
   
   Upgraded Netty to 4.2.17.Final (fixes CVE-2026-75595 SNI routing bypass and
   CVE-2026-75596 pre-handshake DoS, both reachable pre-authentication on the 
FE's
   TLS ports) and Bouncy Castle to 1.85 (fixes CVE-2026-8763 Name Constraints 
bypass
   and CVE-2026-13506 ASN.1 nesting-depth guard reset).
   
   ### Check List (For Author)
   
   - Test: Manual test - verified every bumped coordinate resolves from Maven
     Central, cross-checked the before/after advisory sets against OSV, and 
diffed
     the netty-buffer class surface Arrow depends on to confirm the patch bump 
is
     API-compatible. A local FE build was not possible in this environment 
because
     `thirdparty/installed/bin/protoc` is absent, so CI is relied on for 
compile and
     FE unit tests; these are version-only changes with no code touched.
   - Behavior changed: No
   - Does this need documentation: No
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to