YanzhiJin5 commented on issue #63609: URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/issues/63609#issuecomment-5451662679
Hi @ShummGen, Thank you very much for doing the additional GDB inspection. This is already enough for the current step, so please don't spend more time investigating this truncated core. The output confirms that the stack memory needed to unwind the crashing thread is missing from the saved core. The additional register, signal, mapping, and disassembly information does not recover the Doris application frames, so I don't think transferring this 3 GB truncated core would provide enough additional value to justify the effort or data-handling risk. Please just preserve the matching `doris_be` binary and the existing artifacts for now. Your idea of increasing the core-dump limit for a **future naturally occurring crash** would be very useful if it is operationally acceptable. There is no need to deliberately reproduce or trigger another crash for this investigation. If a future complete core becomes available, we can inspect the actual crash-time state directly. I have enough information from you for now. I will continue the investigation from the source/history and local-test side before asking you for anything further. Thank you again for taking the time to collect all of this. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
