0AyanamiRei opened a new pull request, #57197:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/57197

   ### What problem does this PR solve?
   
   Issue Number: close #xxx
   
   Related PR: #xxx
   
   Problem Summary:
   
   During the load of a auto partition table, we will meet this case:
    
                              create partition rpc (need create partition : 
"2025-10-21" )
   sink1 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 FE
                              create partition rpc (need create partition : 
"2025-10-21" )
   sink2 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 FE
   
   The FE's processing of these two RPCs is not atomic within a single import 
transaction, so we need to ensure the idempotence of this RPC.  
   
   But, if the FE processes the RPC from sink1 first, creating partition 
"2025-10-21", and then creates several tablets under it while selecting BEs for 
them.  Assuming tablet1's replica is assigned to [BE-1].
   
   ----> This time,  a tablet migration occurs (for load balancing), causing 
tablet1 move from  [BE1] to [BE2]. When the FE processes the second RPC, it 
returns the post-migration information, resulting in inconsistent tablet1 
replica distribution information observed by the two RPC initiators. 
   
   This indicates that the createPartition RPC is not idempotent.
   
   Fix this case:
   When the first RPC creates a partition and selects BE1 as the replica for 
tablet1, we record this information on a per-transaction basis. In the next 
RPC, we can simply return the recorded information.
   
   ### Release note
   
   None
   
   ### Check List (For Author)
   
   - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
       - [ ] Regression test
       - [ ] Unit Test
       - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
       - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
           - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
           - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
           - [ ] No code files have been changed.
           - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->
   
   - Behavior changed:
       - [ ] No.
       - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
   
   - Does this need documentation?
       - [ ] No.
       - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: 
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
   
   ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
   
   - [ ] Confirm the release note
   - [ ] Confirm test cases
   - [ ] Confirm document
   - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should 
merge into -->
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to