GoGoWen commented on a change in pull request #6965:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/6965#discussion_r739820481



##########
File path: be/src/olap/reader.cpp
##########
@@ -130,10 +130,16 @@ OLAPStatus Reader::init(const ReaderParams& read_params) {
                      << ", version:" << read_params.version;
         return res;
     }
-
+    // optimize for single rowset reading without do aggregation when reading 
all columns, 
+    // and otherwise should use _agg_key_next_row for AGG_KEYS
     if (_optimize_for_single_rowset(rs_readers)) {
-        _next_row_func = _tablet->keys_type() == AGG_KEYS ? 
&Reader::_direct_agg_key_next_row
-                                                          : 
&Reader::_direct_next_row;
+        if(_tablet->keys_type() == AGG_KEYS && _return_columns.size() == 
_tablet->tablet_schema().num_columns()) {
+            _next_row_func = &Reader::_direct_agg_key_next_row;
+        } else if (_tablet->keys_type() == AGG_KEYS) {
+            _next_row_func = &Reader::_agg_key_next_row;

Review comment:
       For example,  the table test (k int ,k1 int ,k2 int ,k3 int, v int sum), 
 if we read all columns (k,k1,k2,k3,v),  then it definitely no need to call 
agg.  However,  if we just need (k,k1,v),  then if we do not call agg, there 
are many  many duplicate-key rows for next caller(may be aggregation node),   
it's not a good idea to pass these rows without aggregation to aggregation node 
for a query. 




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@doris.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@doris.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@doris.apache.org

Reply via email to