caiconghui commented on a change in pull request #5111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/5111#discussion_r548850976



##########
File path: be/src/exec/olap_scan_node.cpp
##########
@@ -1250,12 +1250,25 @@ void OlapScanNode::transfer_thread(RuntimeState* state) 
{
 
     state->resource_pool()->release_thread_token(true);
     VLOG(1) << "TransferThread finish.";
-    std::unique_lock<std::mutex> l(_row_batches_lock);
-    _transfer_done = true;
+    {
+        std::unique_lock<std::mutex> l(_row_batches_lock);
+        _transfer_done = true;
+    }
     _row_batch_added_cv.notify_all();
+
+    std::unique_lock<std::mutex> l(_scan_batches_lock);
+    while (_running_thread != 0) {

Review comment:
       Is it better to use C++11 promise and future to instead of checking 
_running_thread == 0? every scanner_thread just need to set its promise value 
when finish task with lock free, and close OlapScanNode close just need to wait 
all scanner_thread return future result ? 




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@doris.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@doris.apache.org

Reply via email to