This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

chtompki pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-lang.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new 669f683  (docs) formatting nit
669f683 is described below

commit 669f6833e3356f210dd463c56d2f6544bda7439b
Author: Rob Tompkins <chtom...@apache.org>
AuthorDate: Sat Jul 11 17:24:29 2020 -0400

    (docs) formatting nit
---
 .../java/org/apache/commons/lang3/concurrent/locks/LockingVisitors.java | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git 
a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/concurrent/locks/LockingVisitors.java 
b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/concurrent/locks/LockingVisitors.java
index 4904472..c3dce37 100644
--- 
a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/concurrent/locks/LockingVisitors.java
+++ 
b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/concurrent/locks/LockingVisitors.java
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ import org.apache.commons.lang3.function.FailableFunction;
  * objects are an alternative to synchronization.
  *
  * Locking is preferable, if there is a distinction between read access 
(multiple threads may have read access
- * concurrently), and write access (only one thread may have write access at 
any given time. In comparison,
+ * concurrently), and write access (only one thread may have write access at 
any given time). In comparison,
  * synchronization doesn't support read access, because synchronized access is 
exclusive.
  *
  * Using this class is fairly straightforward:

Reply via email to