Author: ebourg
Date: Tue Oct 8 15:15:50 2013
New Revision: 1530303
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1530303
Log:
Replaced 'Mustang' with 'Java 6' in the FAQ
Modified:
commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml
Modified: commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml?rev=1530303&r1=1530302&r2=1530303&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml (original)
+++ commons/proper/jci/trunk/src/site/xdoc/faq.xml Tue Oct 8 15:15:50 2013
@@ -25,14 +25,14 @@
<section name="FAQ">
<subsection name="Isn't compiler support integrated with Java6
(JSR199)?">
Yes, it is now. JSR199 in the end brought the official java
compiler tools that
- now come with Mustang. Progress on this had stalled for many
years. This is how
+ now come with Java 6. Progress on this had stalled for many
years. This is how
JCI was born. JCI provided what was missing from the JDK. And
it still provides
it also for earlier versions. The main author of JCI has later
on joined the EG
and will make sure there is a bridge to the JSR199 API.
</subsection>
<subsection name="Doesn't JSR199 already deprecate JCI?">
Well, as said before ...there are no backports so far. And if
you give the
- the final java tools API in Mustang a try you might well come
back and
+ the final java tools API in Java 6 a try you might well come
back and
enjoy JCI :)
</subsection>
<subsection name="How well tested is the code?">
