This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

garydgregory pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-lang.git

commit 61e87aa1e5a74d4b39140d656967b0bd4b126b93
Author: Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu Jun 18 15:59:37 2026 +0000

    Sort members
---
 .../org/apache/commons/lang3/BitFieldTest.java     | 28 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/BitFieldTest.java 
b/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/BitFieldTest.java
index cc53735c6..1208cf579 100644
--- a/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/BitFieldTest.java
+++ b/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/BitFieldTest.java
@@ -138,20 +138,6 @@ void testGetValue() {
         assertEquals(BF_ZERO.getValue(0), 0);
     }
 
-    /**
-     * Tests the {@link BitField#isAllSet()} method.
-     */
-    @Test
-    void testIsAllSet() {
-        for (int j = 0; j < 0x3F80; j += 0x80) {
-            assertFalse(BF_MULTI.isAllSet(j));
-            assertTrue(BF_ZERO.isAllSet(j));
-        }
-        assertTrue(BF_MULTI.isAllSet(0x3F80));
-        assertFalse(BF_SINGLE.isAllSet(0));
-        assertTrue(BF_SINGLE.isAllSet(0x4000));
-    }
-
     /**
      * Tests that an int mask with the high bit set is treated as 32 unsigned 
bits on the long methods, instead of being sign-extended into bits 32-63.
      */
@@ -171,6 +157,20 @@ void testIntMaskHighBitOnLongHolder() {
         assertEquals(topByte.clear(-1L), 0xFFFFFFFF00FFFFFFL);
     }
 
+    /**
+     * Tests the {@link BitField#isAllSet()} method.
+     */
+    @Test
+    void testIsAllSet() {
+        for (int j = 0; j < 0x3F80; j += 0x80) {
+            assertFalse(BF_MULTI.isAllSet(j));
+            assertTrue(BF_ZERO.isAllSet(j));
+        }
+        assertTrue(BF_MULTI.isAllSet(0x3F80));
+        assertFalse(BF_SINGLE.isAllSet(0));
+        assertTrue(BF_SINGLE.isAllSet(0x4000));
+    }
+
     /**
      * test the isSet() method.
      */

Reply via email to