This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

ggregory pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-io.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new 34cbeb198 ThresholdingOutputStream: a negative threshold should behave 
like a zero threshold and trigger the event on the first write #609
34cbeb198 is described below

commit 34cbeb1981a1ab54d11e007482f90ea71cf32f0b
Author: Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Thu Apr 4 19:52:10 2024 -0400

    ThresholdingOutputStream: a negative threshold should behave like a zero
    threshold and trigger the event on the first write #609
---
 src/changes/changes.xml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/src/changes/changes.xml b/src/changes/changes.xml
index 300389d3b..5d17e4e39 100644
--- a/src/changes/changes.xml
+++ b/src/changes/changes.xml
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ The <action> type attribute can be add,update,fix,remove.
       <action dev="ggregory" type="fix" issue="IO-851" due-to="Sebb, Gary 
Gregory">FileSystemUtils no longer throws IllegalStateException.</action>
       <action dev="ggregory" type="fix"                due-to="Gary 
Gregory">Avoid possible NullPointerException in FileUtils.listAccumulate(File, 
IOFileFilter, IOFileFilter, FileVisitOption...).</action>
       <action dev="ggregory" type="fix" issue="IO-853" due-to="Mike Drob, Gary 
Gregory">BoundedInputStream.reset() not updating count.</action>
+      <action dev="ggregory" type="fix"                due-to="rproserpio, 
Gary Gregory">ThresholdingOutputStream: a negative threshold should behave like 
a zero threshold and trigger the event on the first write #609.</action>
       <!-- UPDATE -->
       <action dev="ggregory" type="update"             due-to="Gary 
Gregory">Bump commons.bytebuddy.version from 1.14.12 to 1.14.13 #605.</action>
       <action dev="ggregory" type="update"             due-to="Gary Gregory, 
Dependabot">Bump org.apache.commons:commons-parent from 67 to 69 #608.</action>

Reply via email to