graben commented on PR #26937: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/26937#issuecomment-5868739918
> One question for @Croway/@davsclaus on scope: this is camel-jackson3 only, and `camel-jackson` (v2) still emits bare `feature.name()`. Is the qualified form intended for jackson3 alone (it does have more feature enums where ambiguity is likelier), or should v2 mirror it for consistency? Not a blocker either way. Yes, this is a problem that only occurs with Jackson 3. Features were split across multiple Enum files and there exists duplicated feature names. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
