eshepelyuk opened a new issue, #6091:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/6091

   ### Requirement
   
   [Zulip 
Conversation](https://camel.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/257299-camel-k/topic/IntegrationProfile.20deprecation.20in.202.2E5.2E0)
   
   [This page](https://camel.apache.org/blog/2024/11/camel-k-2-5/) mentions 
that `IntegrationProfile` should not be used in favour of `IntegrationPlatform`.
   
   So plz suggest how I can handle following case.
   
   We're creating multiple `IntegrationProfile` with different trait 
configurations.
   In particular for jvm RAM configuration, like this.
   
   ```yaml
    jvm:
     options:
       - -Xmx256m
       - -Xms128m
   ```
   
   I.e. we're having few profiles: small-ram, medium-ram, large-ram, so we can 
apply desired RAM config for an Integration depending on RAM demand/performance 
requirements, etc.
   
   
   ### Problem
   
   How can this be handled without `IntegrationProfile` ?
   Is the only solution is to install multiple operator instances mirroring 
`IntegrationProfile` via their `IntegrationPlatform` ?
   
   ### Proposal
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Open questions
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to