aldettinger commented on code in PR #6289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/6289#discussion_r1688306891
##########
poms/bom/src/main/generated/flattened-reduced-pom.xml:
##########
@@ -8428,6 +8412,78 @@
<artifactId>quarkus-hazelcast-client-deployment</artifactId>
<version>4.0.0</version>
</dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>io.quarkiverse.langchain4j</groupId>
+ <artifactId>quarkus-langchain4j-core-runtime-spi</artifactId>
+ <version>0.16.4</version>
+ </dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>io.quarkiverse.langchain4j</groupId>
+ <artifactId>quarkus-langchain4j-core</artifactId>
+ <version>0.16.4</version>
+ </dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>io.quarkiverse.langchain4j</groupId>
+ <artifactId>quarkus-langchain4j-core-deployment</artifactId>
+ <version>0.16.4</version>
+ </dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>dev.langchain4j</groupId>
+ <artifactId>langchain4j</artifactId>
+ <version>0.32.0</version>
+ </dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>dev.langchain4j</groupId>
+ <artifactId>langchain4j-core</artifactId>
+ <version>0.32.0</version>
+ <type>test-jar</type>
+ <classifier>tests</classifier>
+ </dependency>
+ <dependency>
Review Comment:
Need more thinking indeed, jsoup & lombok would be too high a price.
Actually, I'm not even sure it would have the desired effect.
Like, let's say this pr is integrated and a next quarkus-platform release
embed it.
Would the dependency management include the `quarkus-langchain4j-bom` ? Like
an application depending on quarkus-langchain4j-ollama would have the right
version pulled from dependency management ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
