tdiesler commented on PR #5639:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/5639#issuecomment-2172926449

   > Thanks for the work. However, I think this is going too deep in 
introspecting the value provided by the user. The operator should not peek at 
any config or secret for a matter of sensitive data. In fact, the goal of the 
feature is to let the user only provide the configuration and the goal of the 
operator should be syntactic sugar, transforming the trait parameter into the 
env container format. We should not worry if the user has provided a missing 
value, this should be an error that the rest of kubernetes logic should worry 
about.
   
   Of course, I should have thought about that and read the issue description 
properly. I'll have something alternative to look at later today.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to