christophd commented on PR #12474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/12474#issuecomment-1864301387

   > 3. the get command has been called get for all its life in camel-k, and we 
use same name in camel-jbang, so I think its not a good idea to rename it to 
list (old habbits die hard)
   
   I see that the `camel get` provides many more details. I guess the `list` 
command I was doing here in this PR is more like the `camel ps` command. Should 
I use `camel k ps` then? I personally don't like `ps` very much so I am ok to 
use `camel k get` but just wanted to get some feedback. @davsclaus @oscerd 
@squakez  


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to