squakez commented on code in PR #4942:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/4942#discussion_r1410186010


##########
pkg/cmd/operator/operator.go:
##########
@@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ func Run(healthPort, monitoringPort int32, leaderElection 
bool, leaderElectionID
        selector := labels.NewSelector().Add(*hasIntegrationLabel)
 
        selectors := map[ctrl.Object]cache.ByObject{
-               &corev1.Pod{}:        {Label: selector},

Review Comment:
   Something else I thought is that we don't watch directly the Pods resource 
at all. If we remove that capability we should be okey. I was already thinking 
about this optimization because after all, we would always react on events on 
the manager of those Pods (Deployment). The only cons is that we loose a finer 
grain check and won't react on minor changes on managed Integration Pods (ie, 
the user change some value directly on the Pod which does not affect the 
Deployment). I can do some further testing on this part and we can discuss how 
to progress once I have some test performed.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to