JiriOndrusek commented on PR #4951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/4951#issuecomment-1580970664

   > I am not sure if we want to be supporting `micrometer-registry-jmx` 
directly in this project. Otherwise, we have to maintain the dependencies, 
tests and docs explaining how to configure it.
   > 
   > Support for the different Micrometer registry implementations lives here:
   > 
   > https://github.com/quarkiverse/quarkus-micrometer-registry/
   > 
   > So maybe a better way would be to add 
`io.quarkiverse.micrometer.registry:quarkus-micrometer-registry-jmx` only to 
the test BOM. And just replace the table in our [usage 
docs](https://camel.apache.org/camel-quarkus/next/reference/extensions/micrometer.html#extensions-micrometer-usage)
 with a link to 
[here](https://quarkiverse.github.io/quarkiverse-docs/quarkus-micrometer-registry/dev/index.html)
 .
   > 
   > It's a bit of an open question whether we even need to test the JMX bits 
at all, given it's already tested elsewhere.
   > 
   > WDYT @ppalaga?
   
   The dependency is changed and moved.
   Table in the doc is replaced but I had to keep onel dependency for 
prometheus which is not part of the quarkiverse doc.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to